PARAPHRASING STRATEGIES IN AI AND HUMAN WRITING: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Authors

  • Oripova Madinabonu A’zamovna Kimyo International University in Tashkent English Education Faculty 4rd year student Author

Keywords:

AI paraphrasing, human paraphrasing, meaning retention, academic writing, linguistic accuracy

Abstract

This study explores the differences in paraphrasing strategies employed by AI-based tools and human writers, focusing on syntax, vocabulary diversity, and meaning retention. With the growing integration of AI in education, understanding how AI paraphrasing tools compare to human capabilities is essential. While AI tools offer speed and convenience in academic writing, concerns regarding linguistic accuracy and contextual comprehension remain. The research analyzes the effectiveness of AI-powered paraphrasing tools, examining their strengths and limitations in relation to human paraphrasing techniques. Through comparative analysis, this study aims to highlight the advantages and potential drawbacks of AI paraphrasing, emphasizing the need for critical engagement with these tools in academic contexts.

References

Xuyen, N. T. (2023, June). Using the online paraphrasing tool Quillbot to assist students in paraphrasing the Source Information: English-majored students’ perceptions. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 21-27).

Dung, T. T. M. (2010). An investigation in paraphrasing experienced by Vietnamese students of English in academic writing (Master’s thesis, University of Da Nang). University of Da Nang Repository.

• McCarthy, J., Minsky, M., Rochester, N., & Shannon, C. E. (1955). A proposal for the Dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence. Retrieved from https://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/history/dartmouth/dartmouth.html

• Nilsson, N. J. (2010). The quest for artificial intelligence: A history of ideas and achievements. Cambridge University Press.

• Pea, R. D. (1993). The role of computer technology in reinventing education. Educational Researcher, 22(4), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465431022004003

• Sleeman, D., & Brown, J. S. (1982). Intelligent tutoring systems. Academic Press.

Givon, T. (2022). AI and academic writing: The rise of paraphrasing tools. Journal of Writing Technologies, 9(2), 125-138.

Joubert, M. (2021). The effectiveness of paraphrasing tools in educational contexts: A review. International Journal of Educational Technology, 18(4), 205-217.

Karaoglan, A. (2020). Paraphrasing for academic success: A case study on AI-based tools. Journal of Academic Writing, 6(1), 58-70.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-26